Showing posts with label LGBT protection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LGBT protection. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 19, 2019

Stories of the people who need the Equality Act

Not even a full half of the states of this country protect LGBT people, which is why we need this law.

Congressional Democrats reintroduced a sweeping nondiscrimination bill last week to bolster protections for LGBTQ Americans. If passed into law, the bill would clarify existing protections and fill the gaps in federal nondiscrimination laws.

The bill would amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to ban discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation in housing, employment, education, federal programs, jury service, public accommodations, and credit and lending. It would also update the law to include protections against discrimination in public spaces and services like retail stores, transportation services, banks, and legal services.

According to the Movement Advancement Project, only 21 states and the District of Columbia have passed laws explicitly prohibiting discrimination and gender identity in employment and housing. Twenty states and D.C. explicitly prohibit discrimination in public accommodations. Only 14 states have non-discrimination laws covering credit discrimination.


Full story

Senator Manchin Doesn't Support Equality Act

Although it sounds bad on the surface, what he says is honest. Laws like this need to be laid out step by step so that no one can weasel out of it, like the Republicans. If the law that exists in New York won't stand up well in the face of the conservative SCOTUS then clearly we need something that is stronger at the federal level.

“I strongly support equality for all people and do not tolerate discrimination of any kind. No one should be afraid of losing their job or losing their housing because of their sexual orientation,” Manchin told the press. “I am not convinced that the Equality Act as written provides sufficient guidance to the local officials who will be responsible for implementing it, particularly with respect to students transitioning between genders in public schools.”


Full story